Printer-friendly version of this topic Bookmark this topic (Registered users only)		Previous Topic | Next Topic
VPC Forums Fighters and Warbirds
Original message

ski Certificates/Ratings/Crew Stations: "Warbird rides and FAA rules" 01-12-05, 20:07z  Why does the FAA prohibit the use of certain aircraft such as P-51's from being used to make money with rides but allow T-6's? I see Stallion-51 offers "orientation flights" in TF-51's. Why is that allowed? I am not a pilot yet but that would be my dream business - offering warbird rides. I also believe that it would keep these vintage aircraft and our history alive. Obviously, we have a demand for such flights because people are paying $30k+ to go to Russia and fly Migs. What is the FAA objection? Any information on this is much appreciated. Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Table of Contents

Subject      Author      Message Date     ID      RE: Warbird rides and FAA rules Ben_Chiu 01-13-05 1

Forums | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

Messages in this topic

Ben_Chiu Certificates/Ratings/Crew Stations: 1. "RE: Warbird rides and FAA rules" 01-13-05, 23:48z  Greetings ski: > Why does the FAA prohibit the use of certain aircraft such as P-51's > from being used to make money with rides but allow T-6's? I see > Stallion-51 offers "orientation flights" in TF-51's. Why is that > allowed? AFAIK, the FAA doesn't "prohibit" anyone from using aircraft to make money with if they can meet the requirements for a certificate that allows carrying passengers for hire. (Well, there are exceptions like current military aircraft are prohibited if I recall correctly.) What usually keeps folks from entering this kind of business are the costs involved with insurance and obtaining and maintaining an FAA air carrier certificate. The numbers usually don't work out. Now this is just a guess, but perhaps the fact that the P-51 is usually a single seater and the T-6 is a dual seater, and the relative costs of each has something to do with the practicality of running such businesses. What some organizations do is "bend" the rules a bit by requiring passengers to become members of their organization to reduce some of the liability/costs/rules, but it's a shaky path at best if something goes wrong. > I am not a pilot yet but that would be my dream business - > offering warbird rides. I also believe that it would keep these vintage > aircraft and our history alive. Obviously, we have a demand for such > flights because people are paying $30k+ to go to Russia and fly Migs. As we all know, the rules are a lot more flexible in Russia. > What is the FAA objection? Any information on this is much appreciated. Hope this helps. Ben -= VPC OffLine Reader 2.1 =- Registered to: Ben Chiu -OLR.PL v1.83- Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Lock | Archive | Remove

Forums | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

Select another Forum ===================== FlightAdventures Virtual Pilot Center™ (Forums)   |--FSFORUM   |--Aerobatics and Air Shows   |--The Future for GA   |--Airframes and Powerplants   |--Airlines and Airliners   |--Fighters and Warbirds   |--Flight Training   |--Aviation Safety   |--File Library - Upload, Search, and Download   |--VPC Tech